How different will the birth of Kate and William’s baby be from Royal little ones through history
Market Square.But however new and exciting the arrival will be for us not to mention William and Kate the young Cambridge will be only the latest in a series of Royal babies welcomed through the ages.And in the h michael kors handbags ours before our future king or queen appears, we peer into the past to see how different his or her birth will be from the arrival of the Royals that have gone before.Dr Andrew Thompson, lecturer in History at Queen College, Cambridge, who has written about monarchy in the 18th and 19th century, said a big difference will be in the numbers milling around while the Duchess of Cambridge has her child.He said Royal mums of the past were subjected to rather more public births because of the circumstances surrounding the arrival of Catholic King James II son in 1688.The prospect of another Catholic monarch meant some tried to claim the heir to the throne had been stillborn and an impostor had been smuggled in in his place in a warming pan.Dr Thompson said: the 17th or the 18th century, when it looked as if the heir to the throne was going to be born, you would have to have a lot of (Government) ministers around to ensure that this really was the future king and no tricks were being pulled. tradition persisted until King George VI Queen Elizabeth father put a stop to it in 1948.And in another contrast, Dr Thomp michael kors handbags son said, tec michael kors handbags hnological advances make it much more possible to predict when births are going to happen.In 1736, Prince Frederick wife, Augusta, went into labour and instead of rallying the rest of Hampton Court to witness the birth, the son of George II bundled his wife into a coach headed for his house in London. Dr Thompson described this as the optimum situationHe said: much more possible now to make these preparations in advance and choreograph things. whatever the differences, bags of interest in the birth of a Royal baby is nothing new.Dr Thompson said: the past, the importance of having an heir to the throne was very much associated with political security. Clarissa Campbell Orr, a reader in History at Anglia Ruskin University, said some relatives of the Queen Mother had stayed away when the birth of our now monarch was imminent to avoid encouraging the media attention.And further back still, there was a nationwide period of grief and mourning after the death of King George III granddaughter, Princess Charlotte of Wales, following childbirth in 1817.But, Miss Campbell Orr sid: would say that of course there huge media attention (now) but it does seem to be rather different from the attention that Princes Diana got which at the time was the beginning of the real 24/7 global media. Duke and Duchess baby will be born at St Mary Hospital in Paddington, west London, where Prince William was born in 1982.Toasty tradition continues with rugTraditions surrounding the birth of Royal babies do not just revolve around the Royal household.An English woollen mill which made michael kors handbags a rug for the Queen when she was a baby has continued the Royal link by giving one to the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge for their newborn.Otterburn Mill in Northumberland was asked by Buckingham Palace officials 87 years ago to make a bespoke pram rug for Princess Elizabeth.The mill, close to the Scottish Borders, was popular with the aristocracy for its tweeds and woollens, and it began manufacturing soft baby rugs to fit prams.The mill present day owner Euan Pringle hoped to keep the royal tradition alive by sending one to William and Kate.